Because I like him and he's working for me right now (and for my mom, who enjoys flatting him--this guy has three very nice gaits), I haven't been too concerned about what his past history was. I know what I know from riding him. My friend who hooked me up with him told me he did "the big jumpers." But she's a dressage rider, and she doesn't show at all, and hasn't been to many jumper shows if any. So when I asked for further clarification about divisions and whatnot, she didn't know.
The thing about jumping is that, as I said in my rules change post, a jump that looks tiny to you might look huge to me. So if you don't jump at all (and are perhaps afraid of it), or you're just starting out, or you're riding a horse without a lot of ability, or hell--if you've been schooling 2' in the indoor all winter, a 3' square oxer could look enormous to you. That's fine. So my friend doesn't have her eye up as far as jumping goes. But when you say "the big jumpers" to me, I think Open Jumpers and up. Big jumps. Money classes.
I got bored the other day so I decided to dig around and see what, exactly, the "big jumpers" were that Red did. It took a bit of digging because I didn't have his USEF number and I wasn't sure of his registered name (Amaterasu, my friend thought). Then I got smarter, and looked up his owner's USEF page. Sure enough, there was an Amato Rosso. There's our guy!
From what I can tell, his owner started him in the 80cm classes in 2009. This is perfectly reasonable, about 2'6". He moved up to the 90cm (2'9") and then the 1.0m (3'3"). This is the standard progression. I kept scrolling, kind of expecting to see a meteoric rise in height, but I didn't, because he's a normal horse and she's an amateur. They had some good results, but the highest they did was the 1.15m (3'7", or prelim height).
Does that mean I like him less than I did before? Hell no. I also don't think this means AT ALL that his scope tops out at 3'6". I know the difference between a good jumper and a bad jumper, and I have personally trotted a 4' jump on him. Who knows why he didn't make it further. Perhaps he would have if he hadn't blown his suspensory. Or maybe he wouldn't have. It doesn't matter one bit.
So there you have it. An "I don't know anything about this horse in my barn" story that doesn't end in the fairytale "holy shit he did mini prix" stuff that people love to write about. Red had an average career in the low-level jumpers and that's where he stopped. While I am very unlikely to take him to rated jumper shows because I am poor and I have to focus on Mo's career first, I have a good feeling about him jumping around 1.15m again with me if it sounds fun and a show comes up. I wasn't likely to show him any higher than that anyway, in consideration for his leg. He's SO much fun to ride and that, at the end of the day, is what matters.
Oh, but one cool thing: his dad was a famous GP stallion, Amaretto D ii. Cute, huh? Looks just like my guy, but a hand shorter and a slightly more refined face.
Not that I would trade these big loppy old ears for any face.
They don't even fit in the frame! |
I love that you've been able to find out more about Red. He is quite like his papa huh?
ReplyDeleteI consider "upper level" to be Jr Ams and up. Big stuff 1.40m. When you get to the 1.60m that's the elite. It's one thing to school at home 4 ft it's another to go around that height in a show. Hobbs had scope and my trainer tried him in the 1.20m but felt he was the best at 1.15. And he was, the High Child Adults at 1.15 was where he was awesome. So that's where he stayed. Maybe that was the same with Red?
ReplyDeleteTotally possible. He only showed the 1.15m once I think (at a rated show anyway). He's 16, not 9, so even a couple years ago he probably wasn't cruising on up the levels. That's not why I have him anyway so I'm good. :)
DeleteThe highs can be 1.10m or 1.15m. Usually the classics are 1.15
Deletevery cool! he sounds like a great guy and i'm so glad you're having fun with him - despite him being completely average
ReplyDeleteWhat fun! I agree that 3'7" isn't "the big jumpers" but in world, it's pretty darn close. That said, I am an un-closeted adult ammie without grand prix ambitions.
ReplyDelete3'7" sounds ginormous to me! Its all relative, like you said ;]
ReplyDelete